Maybe it was but I just think the way it approached it was a bit rude. Telling me to keep up, like I wasn't aware omega had made an automatic chronograph.
It all came from my view that the standard Speedmaster Pro was overpriced and I think pushing £7k retail for these is mental. I would like to see omega do something different like add a similar movement to the 57 or maybe the ceramic bezel from the 321 rather than just keep increasing the price.
Sometime in the mid to late 70s I bought a new Moonwatch. Cost £400 iirc and I thought that was a heck of a lot to pay for a watch, but I'd always wanted one so.....
Sold it in 2001, virtually unworn for £800, and I was amazed to have doubled my money.
How times and prices have changed!
The speedy is a great watch but the design doesn't scream 'affluence' in today's market. That's not a bad thing but its bound to decrease desirability as the flagship watch in a brand.
More to the point, Omega's marketing and branding work over recent years hasn't really increased their cachet where they can be charging these sort of retail prices.
Breitling and Tudor, at their relative price points, have done a much better job IMO.