My independent can do the ref 16600 to full depth but not the SDDS.
Type: Posts; User: JP Chestnut
My independent can do the ref 16600 to full depth but not the SDDS.
Some people like wearing watches. Some people like looking at them under an electron microscope. TRF sucks, but what do I know? I don't have a friend with a 1969 Ferrari.
You generally get what you pay for. At this price, I don't think you're paying for a level of quality that I'd be comfortable with. I'd pass regardless of whatever nonsense Mick is spewing once again.
Moral outrage over a stupid thread on a watch forum? This hobby really brings out the weirdos. It's rather a shame that TRF banned you - you were perfect for that place.
I'm not sure, but your comment is definitely in the running, you alpha you.
That was definitely a great era, but I think the 3227 just tops it. IWC had Richemont R&D money, which they used to create the in-house movement, yet they were still left alone. After the 3227...
The 3536 was, minus the movement, higher quality than a 16610. It was easily on par with the current Sub. The current AT is total crap in comparison.
Indeed that's the case. I used to read posts on here about London availability, shake my head, and think "never in the US". It's crazy here now too.
Rolex has streamlined the GMT2 product line, and they didn't do it for lack of demand. Why then? To increase production efficiency. Why do that unless the plan is to use the decreased set up times to...
There is no reason for VC to use a decentralized linked ledger. They might use a linked ledger, but no anonymous workers are going to be working nonstop to generate their keys. That's not really a...
I hope he finds his perfect mate in prison.
The Cosmograph in gold was over seven times the price of the SS version. If the current gold Daytona was that much more than the SS version, it would be over $90,000.
They're going to release a video showing three LV super fakes in the near future.
Definitely. I like my standard Tuna. It's big and bold, but wearable for me.
Lug to lug matters a lot. IWC's tend to be relatively long.
IWC have to buy up millions of dollars of oversized watches would support your belief.
There's no doubt that it's not a representative sample. Even his USA cohort group isn't representative of the USA since it's getting pulled from The Armoury customers - guys who dress like this: ...
These new Cellinis are tough for me. They're REALLY nice and I'm a longtime Rolex guy who would love a proper Rolex dress watch.. However, I have zero interest in a 39mm dress watch that's 11mm...
OP should be scraping Watch Recon, and Ebay sold listings worldwide while controlling for seasonality at the least. Even so, tons of watches sell through Instagram (which I don't really...
F & G will often be called "blades". Part E is "clasp cover". Part D is the "clasp attachment link". The clasp attachment link can be on the 6 or 12 side, or both. Part A is the "bracelet clasp".
...
I love the passion for horology. However, if one of my students turned this in I would probably give them a "C-". You can't generalize any sort of trends based on the sales from one EU forum. The...
Any watch will sell quickly at the right price. Of course, it helps if it's a watch that many people like. I'm sure a cheap mm300 would go fast too.
Circa 1990, Rolex Bubblebacks were some of the most collectable watches in the world and they were priced as such. Look at them now. Panerai definitely "burst" from their early collector frenzy high...
Bremont is the most naff brand around and I don't understand why people on this forum stopped hating them.
It has a man's butt on the dial. What else can you say?