It looks like my Tudor had the privilege of taking your tester on it's maiden voyage, and they both passed with flying colours
It looks like my Tudor had the privilege of taking your tester on it's maiden voyage, and they both passed with flying colours
very nice indeed, but does it have Netflix?
Duncan, many thanks for answering my question - I've been away down the Work Hole for a good few days and completely forgot that I'd posted. Curiosity satisfied and I can absolutely see the logic that even the sturdiest of cases and crystals must exhibit some flex on the micron scale, under 10+ bar.
As an aside I'm always perplexed by people who say they won't do the washing-up (say) in a 5 bar watch - when I consider the pressure in my car's rear tyres (3 bar) it seems nonsensical that a 5 bar watch would be at risk in a few inches of water. But, you pays yer money, and takes yer choice.
Extremely handy, but it doesn't test over 10 Bar? So you cannot test the "real divers" that "need" 20 Bar and over...
I can routinely test up to 300bar pressure/ 3,000m depth or 400bar pressure/ 4,000m depth with an additional clamp using my hydrostatic tester which is enough for most dive watches. I think you've missed my point in this thread