Is it that men don't put ">>>>>" in their post titles? ;-)

Seriously though, any idea how this compares to the Timegraphers in terms of accuracy etc.? I got a Timegrapher 1900 a few months ago and so far have found it a bit finicky. Haven't quite got the knack of getting a reliable reading out of it yet. Even when it's working exactly as it should, the graphs can be difficult to interpret.

The graphs on the app look very clear, but I'm not sure if that's a sign that it's taking less accurate readings then interpolating a smooth (but inaccurate) graph, or if it's doing a better job of showing the most relevant data clearly.