Originally Posted by
BillyCasper
Apparently the SRA is represented as a core participant in the inquiry. Perhaps also bar standards are there. The Met are.
https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/po...118195.article
Singh's testimony makes you want to cry. His obvious misery is self-inflicted. Dull-witted denial of the evidence laid out in front of him. How on earth did he qualify, let alone be let loose on criminal cases?
Today's Law Society Gazette reporting...Post Office Inquiry:
...Regulators have said they are following the proceedings carefully and will make decisions about any possible disciplinary action once the inquiry has finished. There are many sub-postmasters who want action taken much sooner.
Meanwhile, the roll call of lawyers being summoned to give their version of events grows ever longer. For the rest of the profession, it makes fascinating – and uncomfortable – viewing.