Quote Originally Posted by adrianw View Post
Probably an attempt to reinforce a defence that these people are not trustworthy and lacking integrity, what a way to try and justify the post office position
Sorry, I've confused matters!

It was the inquiry counsel that was referring to documents which contained these criminal cases. He was trying to further shed light on the failures of the Horizon system, but I just found it strange that these documents were brought up. Of course the inquiry counsel is not a judge or there to 'try' the interviewee and is just trying to get to the bottom of things. I guess I just found it a little shocking that, given everything so far has been all about the innocence of the SPMs, that there actually were some that were not innocent after all.