Sounds a bit pointless to me......a Bourne film without Jason Bourne/Matt Damon :roll:
The fourth film in the Jason Bourne series looks like it will feature neither Jason Bourne or Matt Damon. Apparently, Paul Greengrass didn't want to direct it, and Matt Damon wasn't interested if Paul Greengrass wasn't directing. Doesn't fill me with enthusiasm for the film.
http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/629281/ ... ourne.html
Sounds a bit pointless to me......a Bourne film without Jason Bourne/Matt Damon :roll:
Sounds like a money making exercise :wink:
Indeed, one that will result in a straight to DVD job if they get it wrong.Originally Posted by mffw
Sounds terrible. :(
Sadly I fear this may become known as 'The Bum Legacy', which is a shame as the current trilogy are top notch.
Eh?
Wasnt it only written as a trilogy?
At least I thought it was.
Sounds like the start of the James Bond franchise to me.
Love the first three but cannot imagine it without Matt Damon :(
Cheers
Simon
Ralph Waldo Emerson: We ask for long life, but 'tis deep life, or noble moments that signify. Let the measure of time be spiritual, not mechanical.
What!! without Sean Connery ?? Heaven forbid, it will never work ............................. :DOriginally Posted by WORKSIMON
EDITED
:lol: But I love Matt :love4: :love4: :love4: :love4:Originally Posted by oldandgrumpy
Cheers
Simon
Ralph Waldo Emerson: We ask for long life, but 'tis deep life, or noble moments that signify. Let the measure of time be spiritual, not mechanical.
..........and of course it never did.Originally Posted by oldandgrumpy
F.T.F.A.
I am a massive fan of the Bourne Trilogy, and IMO it will be difficult to change the mix and have the same excellent end results.
Must be easy for any half decent film director to do fast action movies , as long as the story is a R Ludlum novel they could get rowan atkinson to play JB .
There was only one Bourne for me ...Richard Chamberlin(am i showing my age)- still have it on VHS
Why do they have to kick the ar*e out of a good thing? Leave it alone Holywood, you've made your money, now move on!!!!
He was in deep cover before that, pretending to be Dr. Kildare. :wink:Originally Posted by lewie
F.T.F.A.
Meh, there were only 3 books written by Ludlum, the fourth is written by a nobody IMO. Though the books have very little relation to the films, so very different (the trilogy still ranks as my favourite action books)
At least he isn't "So Ronery" :lol:Originally Posted by barneygumble
Bloody hell wasn't he Dr Kildare?Originally Posted by lewie
I saw that not too long ago, must admit prefer the Matt Damon ones.Originally Posted by lewie
I feel the RC one was truer to the book thoughOriginally Posted by sevvy