Given current IWC prices, hoping for a movement, case and dial that work together in cohesion surely is not an unreasonable expectation - even if it did involve a movement reengineered for the purpose.
The XVIII just looks wrong to my eye. It throws the whole dial off. The first thing I thought when I saw it was “tiddly movement nicked from some other watch”. This in a watch that will be what, £5-6k perhaps?
Edited to add: Having seen the (ghastly) Mk XVIII Top Gun Miramar, making the date wheel black helps a bit - but not a lot.
Last edited by Si; 6th January 2016 at 22:37.
I believe that Oris' simpler method of stacking a larger date disc on top of the existing one doesn't require any other alterations, but I haven't seen this particular one in detail.
Nonetheless, for a smaller company using the same movement to have a solution to the awkward-looking-date-placement-on-big-dial problem available — and at a much lower price — raises the question of why IWC lacks similar attention to detail. :)
I like IWC watches, I have a couple of Aquatimers and would happily have an Ingenieur as well if I had the spare cash. I've had a previous incarnation of the pilot chrono & feel able to comment as IWC has taken a fair amount of my hard earned over the years. I see absolutely nothing in this watch that would make me consider it for a second, it looks a really plain piece.
I think this is one of my favourite threads in recent weeks - informative, funny, and civilized!
I think I'm with the majority here - the small movement in a large case is a bugbear of mine (see Zenith pilot watches, some of the NOMOS range). I wasn't aware that Oris had got around this problem so nicely.
Agree that the xviii looks badly balanced. Feels like they couldn't really be bothered.
The 36mm version does look rather smart, but I think I'll be sticking with my xvi for now...