closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 107

Thread: My Dad's 1953 Vintage Omega Seamaster restored by Paul Walker

  1. #51
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    370
    Quote Originally Posted by walkerwek1958 View Post
    Original dial refinished, new hands, new crown, new glass, new mainspring, one jewel replaced.
    Thanks for the correction :)

  2. #52
    Incredible job!
    What a difference- night and day.
    Well done,Paul.

  3. #53
    Wow !
    An amazing transformation ! I'm overwhelmed at such a beautiful example of craftsmanship.
    I'm currently waiting for my own late father's watch to come back from the workshop where it, too, is being restored.
    I can only hope it is as successful as this one.
    (Sigh) Some folk are so clever....

  4. #54
    Superb work. Restored to its original glory - as it should be.

  5. #55
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    South London/Surrey
    Posts
    1,283
    That looks amazing, fantastic work from Paul!

  6. #56
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Huddersfield
    Posts
    206
    Fantastic workmanship from Paul. It is a shame that Omega will not supply parts for these old watches anymore.

  7. #57
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    51
    Sterling job, sir!

  8. #58
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    southampton
    Posts
    1,208
    I love this forum!

    Nice one for the thread and to Mr walker for the write up.

    Beautiful watch!

  9. #59
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Unknown
    Posts
    5,887
    Blog Entries
    1
    Great work as we have come to expect.

  10. #60
    Master dejjl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Posts
    6,988
    Great job Paul, it looks fabulous.

  11. #61
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    6,764
    Looks fantastic, and the correct decision to the replace the parts replaced in my opinion.

  12. #62
    Very impressed with that. Saw the before pic and scrolled down wondering what to expect but was blown away!

  13. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by walkerwek1958 View Post
    Original dial refinished, new hands, new crown, new glass, new mainspring, one jewel replaced.
    The watch looks superb Paul - well done. I am curious though about the dial. Could you tell us more about how you refinished it? The text looks immaculately executed and I see that you've opted to add lume, where the original was unlumed. I have no idea how dial refinishing of this sort of quality is achieved and would be very interested to learn more.
    Thanks
    Martin

  14. #64
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,567
    Quote Originally Posted by MartinCRC View Post
    The watch looks superb Paul - well done. I am curious though about the dial. Could you tell us more about how you refinished it? The text looks immaculately executed and I see that you've opted to add lume, where the original was unlumed. I have no idea how dial refinishing of this sort of quality is achieved and would be very interested to learn more.
    Thanks
    Martin
    I don`t refinish 'em, I send them to these guys http://www.davidbill.co.uk/

    I don`t understand the process myself, I just post the dial off, send a letter explaining what I want (usually it's obvious what to do) and get the dial back after a couple of weeks. Prices have gone up a little but (including postage) it usually works out around £90. The dial, hands and a new glass absolutely transform an old watch. The hard work is in getting the case right, around 10-12 hrs work went into this one doing it my way. The old cases usually have a fairly uniform covering of moderate-deep scratches and they have to be polished out.

    Paul

  15. #65
    Master Chukas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Highlands
    Posts
    1,211
    Excellent job.

  16. #66
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    12,069
    Quote Originally Posted by MartinCRC View Post
    The watch looks superb Paul - well done. I am curious though about the dial. Could you tell us more about how you refinished it? The text looks immaculately executed and I see that you've opted to add lume, where the original was unlumed. I have no idea how dial refinishing of this sort of quality is achieved and would be very interested to learn more.
    Thanks
    Martin
    I think in the Before picture I can see dabs of very dull lume at the outside ends of the indices? (But not on the inside of the numerals)
    Last edited by Der Amf; 30th January 2016 at 19:41.

  17. #67
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,567
    I don't refinish dials myself....these guys do it http://www.davidbill.co.uk/

    I don`t fully understand the process, but I know they strip the old finish off and reprint everything. That's why the script is sometimes very slightly different. If there's any doubt about what to do I talk to them or send a letter with the dial. On this one, they've added lume at 3,6,9 and 12 which may have been present originally but dropped off ages ago. Ideally, the lume should look slightly aged and the hands should be aged slightly to give a slightly better effect.

    A refinished dial, new hands and a new glass make a huge difference to an old watch. Hands can be a real problem, I`ve had hands replated but it's very hit and miss. If new hands are available it's best to buy them and wince at the cost (£40 in this case inc postage from the States). Generic hands in the right style are the next best thing but they always need broaching to fit. Having said that, the genuine Omega ones needed broaching slightly and the minute hand needed curving slightly at the end. Unlike a modern watch, it's never straightforward fitting new hands to an oldie like this, it needs care and patience. Even buying the correct length is harder than it sounds and it's surprising how 'wrong' a watch looks if the hands aren`t correct.

    Case refinishing is the hard bit!

    Paul

  18. #68
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    2,031
    Quote Originally Posted by walkerwek1958 View Post
    I don't refinish dials myself....these guys do it http://www.davidbill.co.uk/

    I don`t fully understand the process, but I know they strip the old finish off and reprint everything. That's why the script is sometimes very slightly different. If there's any doubt about what to do I talk to them or send a letter with the dial. On this one, they've added lume at 3,6,9 and 12 which may have been present originally but dropped off ages ago. Ideally, the lume should look slightly aged and the hands should be aged slightly to give a slightly better effect.

    A refinished dial, new hands and a new glass make a huge difference to an old watch. Hands can be a real problem, I`ve had hands replated but it's very hit and miss. If new hands are available it's best to buy them and wince at the cost (£40 in this case inc postage from the States). Generic hands in the right style are the next best thing but they always need broaching to fit. Having said that, the genuine Omega ones needed broaching slightly and the minute hand needed curving slightly at the end. Unlike a modern watch, it's never straightforward fitting new hands to an oldie like this, it needs care and patience. Even buying the correct length is harder than it sounds and it's surprising how 'wrong' a watch looks if the hands aren`t correct.

    Case refinishing is the hard bit!

    Paul
    This has ignited a previously unrealised desire for a '50's watch. It's a beauty.

  19. #69
    Fantastic and looks better on the leather

  20. #70
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,614
    I can't believe it's the same watch. Well done!

  21. #71
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Cumbria
    Posts
    192
    Stunning watch, very nice project. Thanks for sharing.

  22. #72
    Looks superb. At the risk of lowering the tone, what's a ballpark figure for getting something like this done?

  23. #73
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Unknown
    Posts
    5,887
    Blog Entries
    1
    How do the guys who refinish the dial do the text?

  24. #74
    Master subseastu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Ashby, uk
    Posts
    2,248
    Amazing work, like night and day. It looks an excellent piece

  25. #75
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    754
    That does look stunning.Congrats.

    I don't think Dial restorers can replicate a sunburst finish? The Doxa quartz resto pics on their webpage are pretty terrible. I had a women's Omega dynamic completely serviced and dial restored and the end result was nothing like the original. On the one hand I wasnt bothered because it was an £80 ebay find and the dial was scratched to shit but it was a dissapointing result as a watch collector but hey you can't give a women a beaten up mess for christmas can you.

  26. #76
    Simply put..............Stunning.

    I am sure that your Father would be over the moon with the end result.

  27. #77
    Master geran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,120
    ^ that

  28. #78
    I don`t refinish 'em, I send them to these guys http://www.davidbill.co.uk/.
    Aha, thanks. I've got an old Seamaster myself with a knackered dial and so may give these chaps a try.

    Martin

  29. #79
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    185
    That's some transformtion !

  30. #80
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Bury, UK
    Posts
    2,362
    That's a keeper not a flipper. I work at a Uni and remember a student walking in with old,mint Air-King that had belonged to his grandfather. That Omega captures a time, a person and lots of memories. Lovely restoration.
    Last edited by mrushton; 30th January 2016 at 22:27.

  31. #81
    Grand Master PickleB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    M25 J6 UK
    Posts
    18,377
    I think all the compliments that are due to this restoration have been made above...but I'd like to add my own. The watch now has a whole new life and the OP can enjoy it for years to come. A good decision and wonderful work by Paul.

    Can I ask, please, are there any movement and/or case back photos? If not, did anyone make note of the case reference number and which calibre is it?

    Congratulations to the OP and Paul on how this has turned out.

  32. #82
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,567
    Case ref is 2767-SC. Movement is cal 354.

    Paul

  33. #83
    Stunning work, stunning watch. Love it.

  34. #84
    Craftsman chard101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    381
    Really stunning work, thanks for sharing that with us.

    I bit Paul is about to get swamped!

  35. #85
    Amazing transformation!?!
    Great Job!

  36. #86
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    South East
    Posts
    3,704
    Wow that is mesmerising what a fantastic result it's one of those dials you could just sit and gawp at for hours you must be thrilled.
    My dear old dad was never in to watches but when he passed away 18 months ago I inherited an awesome Frank Sinatra collection, mostly on 8 track and vinyl

  37. #87
    A phenomenal transformation. Fantastic job and lovely result.

  38. #88
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    West Mids
    Posts
    593

    My Dad's 1953 Vintage Omega Seamaster restored by Paul Walker

    That looks beautiful can't believe the difference great work.

  39. #89
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    jersey / London
    Posts
    709
    A great job. Very impressed.

  40. #90
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    West Wales
    Posts
    2,783
    Sorry, have to go against the grain on this one.

    IMVHO it's been OVER restored and lost all it's character.

    Sympathetically restored would have been better.

  41. #91
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    12,069
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave in Wales View Post
    Sorry, have to go against the grain on this one.

    IMVHO it's been OVER restored and lost all it's character.

    Sympathetically restored would have been better.
    What could have been done to that stained dial? (genuine question)

  42. #92
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    West Wales
    Posts
    2,783
    Quote Originally Posted by Der Amf View Post
    What could have been done to that stained dial? (genuine question)
    Just a light cleaning perhaps and NO more.

    The crystal is no doubt making the dial look worse than it is.

    It was in that state because your father wore it since 1953 and it aged accordingly, it has been 'ruined' INVHO, beyond all recognition.

    Your father would not recognise it as his beloved Omega worn all those years, a record of his life.

    All the character of the watch has gone and it now looks like anything stuck in Austin Kays window at an inflated price.
    Last edited by Dave in Wales; 31st January 2016 at 11:38.

  43. #93
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    12,069
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave in Wales View Post
    Just a light cleaning perhaps and NO more.

    The crystal is no doubt making the dial look worse than it is.

    It was in that state because your father wore it since 1953 and it aged accordingly, it has been 'ruined' INVHO, beyond all recognition.

    Your father would not recognise it as his beloved Omega worn all those years, a record of his life.

    All the character of the watch has gone and it now looks like anything stuck in Austin Kays window at an inflated price.
    Well, not my father as I'm not the OP ;)

    I suppose the basic question is: should a watch stand as a memorial to time past, or may it be reborn and have the chance to go round the block a second time?

    Its certainly been "ruined" if you think that an watch ought to be a memorial; an alternative tuppenceworth might be that the dial surface was already ruined, and was dragging down the rest of a watch, a case and a movement that were nowhere near the end of their lives.

    My own (irrelevant) opinion is that for this watch, which was intended by its creators to be both functional and beautiful, restoring the beauty while the functionality is still healthy is fair.

    I would like to see an example of what a light clean would have done to a dial surface in that condition, though, if anyone's got a link?

  44. #94
    Master Reeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Northumberland
    Posts
    3,829
    Each to their own.
    He can always throw it in a swamp if he wants it to look worn out and battered again.

  45. #95
    Craftsman jonasy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    London
    Posts
    759
    Watches is such a fun hobby. No one would ever say the above if it was a suit, an lp player, vintage car, summer house, old boat or whatever. Only watches.

  46. #96
    Craftsman Nuisance Value's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Central Scotland
    Posts
    682
    I think it's a fantastic job, I would be overjoyed if it was mine.

  47. #97
    Master draftsmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Malta and sometimes bits of Brit
    Posts
    5,057
    Lovely job Paul. For my part, I'd rather have something that looks like it came out of Austin Kaye's window than something tatty, scratched and stained.

  48. #98
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,567
    Quote Originally Posted by Der Amf View Post
    What could have been done to that stained dial? (genuine question)
    I`ll answer that one:

    The lacquer had discoloured extensively. Sometimes it's possible to clean the lacquer using an aqueous cleaner; an organic solvent is likely to soften the lacquer and remove it so it's best avoided. Sometimes the whole dial can be carefully cleaned this way and an acceptable end result achieved. That's what I tried on this, but in the darkly marked areas the lacquer had broken down completely and was lifting away from the silvered surface of the dial. It was obvious that cleaning wasn`t feasible, and frankly the dial looked a complete mess as it was. The owner and myself had already agreed that the dial should be refinished if cleaning didn`t work; I wasn`t surprised it couldn`t be cleaned when I saw the heavy tarnished areas, I`ve tried before and had no success when they're that bad.

    A vintage watch restored to look new will always polarise views, more so thesedays than in the past. In an ideal world, a watch like this would have very light even ageing to the dial, very light tarnish on the hands, a case that's not too heavily scratched, and it would wear it's years nicely. This one wasn`t in that category; cosmetically it was in a sorry state and looked worse in the flesh than the photos suggest.

    The term 'original' means all things to all men; to some folks it is the concept of not replacing anything and keeping the existing finish simply because it is original in the sense that nothing's been disturbed, cleaned or refinished. It may be deemed to be original by this definition, but it certainly doesn`t look as it originally did when manufactured and sold; it has morphed into something bearing little resemblance to its condition when new. A better description for such an item is 'heavily aged' in my opinion. Whilst some watches cars or whatever have a certain appeal when aged (patina) we should all remind ourselves, whilst getting misty-eyed, that they do NOT look like they did when new; we are experiencing a different sense of appeal than the original owner did when purchasing the item. In the case of a family heirloom this can be very emotive; some people like to retain the wear and tear because it's how THEY perceive the item, they've never experienced it in it's new condition and they are emotionally locked into how it looked when their relative last owned it. That's fine, I fully respect and appreciate that, and before staring to restore any watch I go to great lengths to ensure the owner is aware of how different the watch will look.

    Like most collectors, I strive to own watches that have the lightest of ageing and retain the original appeal/appearance that they had when new. These are rare finds, I`m lucky to own a few. However, I`m not a fan of the scratched up, tarnished and scruffy and I don`t look to own such examples, I prefer a restored watch that's faithful to it's condition when new, with the correct hands, crown and dial finish. A few of mine meet that criteria and I enjoy them equally. Unlike a collector the owner of an heirloom watch doesn`t have the luxury of choosing which example to own but he does have the choice of what to do with it and I think that should always be respected when passing judgement on the merits of the item. There are no absolutes, only opinions.

    Paul

  49. #99
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Ockham, UK
    Posts
    30
    As the OP here I want to bring in the owner's opinion... my late dad.
    This is him, working as an aircraft engineer. He help to build VC10,BAC1-11,Trident.TSR-2, and Concorde.
    As an engineer he worked in microns and wasn't just meticulous about aircraft parts but everything he worked on like his cars or my bike.
    You will have to take my word for this but he would have been thrilled by Paul's work and full of admiration for bringing his beloved watch
    back to near its original 1953 condition.
    The recent deterioration would have appalled him and he would have been on here looking for someone like Paul to bring it back to life.
    With that in mind I will wear it with pride and his undoubted approval.

    [IMG][/IMG]



    Quote Originally Posted by walkerwek1958 View Post
    I`ll answer that one:

    The lacquer had discoloured extensively. Sometimes it's possible to clean the lacquer using an aqueous cleaner; an organic solvent is likely to soften the lacquer and remove it so it's best avoided. Sometimes the whole dial can be carefully cleaned this way and an acceptable end result achieved. That's what I tried on this, but in the darkly marked areas the lacquer had broken down completely and was lifting away from the silvered surface of the dial. It was obvious that cleaning wasn`t feasible, and frankly the dial looked a complete mess as it was. The owner and myself had already agreed that the dial should be refinished if cleaning didn`t work; I wasn`t surprised it couldn`t be cleaned when I saw the heavy tarnished areas, I`ve tried before and had no success when they're that bad.

    A vintage watch restored to look new will always polarise views, more so thesedays than in the past. In an ideal world, a watch like this would have very light even ageing to the dial, very light tarnish on the hands, a case that's not too heavily scratched, and it would wear it's years nicely. This one wasn`t in that category; cosmetically it was in a sorry state and looked worse in the flesh than the photos suggest.

    The term 'original' means all things to all men; to some folks it is the concept of not replacing anything and keeping the existing finish simply because it is original in the sense that nothing's been disturbed, cleaned or refinished. It may be deemed to be original by this definition, but it certainly doesn`t look as it originally did when manufactured and sold; it has morphed into something bearing little resemblance to its condition when new. A better description for such an item is 'heavily aged' in my opinion. Whilst some watches cars or whatever have a certain appeal when aged (patina) we should all remind ourselves, whilst getting misty-eyed, that they do NOT look like they did when new; we are experiencing a different sense of appeal than the original owner did when purchasing the item. In the case of a family heirloom this can be very emotive; some people like to retain the wear and tear because it's how THEY perceive the item, they've never experienced it in it's new condition and they are emotionally locked into how it looked when their relative last owned it. That's fine, I fully respect and appreciate that, and before staring to restore any watch I go to great lengths to ensure the owner is aware of how different the watch will look.

    Like most collectors, I strive to own watches that have the lightest of ageing and retain the original appeal/appearance that they had when new. These are rare finds, I`m lucky to own a few. However, I`m not a fan of the scratched up, tarnished and scruffy and I don`t look to own such examples, I prefer a restored watch that's faithful to it's condition when new, with the correct hands, crown and dial finish. A few of mine meet that criteria and I enjoy them equally. Unlike a collector the owner of an heirloom watch doesn`t have the luxury of choosing which example to own but he does have the choice of what to do with it and I think that should always be respected when passing judgement on the merits of the item. There are no absolutes, only opinions.

    Paul

  50. #100
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    1
    Wow!

    Absolutely beautiful watch.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information