Who would send a total stranger $10K+ for a sight unseen Rolex emanating from an E-Bay ad?
Does "en caveat emptor" apply in this case?
Well one thing, it puts to bed the box & papers arguments, as they are being faked as much as the watches. I do wonder how many are walking round their "genuine" watch in complete oblivion..
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...lmost-12069499
Who would send a total stranger $10K+ for a sight unseen Rolex emanating from an E-Bay ad?
Does "en caveat emptor" apply in this case?
"But he’ll repay just £29,000 - that's 4.3% of the total"
eBay and PayPal got more out of him in fees. Doesn't look like the buyers will be getting any money back, no mention of it in the news article.
2 threads already running on this.
And only a suspended sentence! Makes no sense after defrauding people out of 700k!
Crime pays.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
There's going to be a lot of unhappy people out there!
Sent from my [device_name] using TZ-UK mobile app
Every Rolex that I have ever bough from a non Rolex source is always with Rolex within 24 hours and I always make sure that the deal takes place either in the house or office of the seller. Also doing the deal in a bank is fine because CCTV is everywhere and that also with a landline phone number gives you protection. Don't ever deal with a mobile number and the watch being sent through the post, that is madness.
Fakes watches are getting better and the fake paperwork is almost undetectable, so you need to be sensible.
this has been covered in previous posts about this seller
Yes you missed big time.
The main thing is to be able to trace him which visiting a house or office makes much easier. Get the serial number on the receipt and if Rolex pronounce it fake, you got an easier recourse. Rolex confirm the authenticity on the spot when they remove the back.
I thought that if you bought something on eBay, (i.e. in an open market), even if it had been stolen the goods could not be confiscated from you .. provided that you were not aware that you were buying stolen goods
I am not saying that I would or condone any such like behaviour, but my point was "just a matter of law"
Am I wrong?
Yes, wholly incorrect.
The legal principle in UK law is "nemo dat quod non habet" --- no one can give that which is not his to give.*
If you do not have title to something, you cannot pass it to another. Whether you bought in good faith or not, if title was not properly passed the the item ain't yours.
* Latin was one of my Masters degree subjects and my translation here is slightly free, but deliberately so in order to help understanding.
H
Gullible people aside, Joe Public has been stiffed again.
That’s a joke of a fine AND sentence. If they’d told him it was an extra year for every 10 grand not paid back, I’d say he’d have found a lot more of it pretty bloody quickly.
Also like to have seen the outcome if he owed the government 700k in tax.
I bought a 20mm bracelet off AliExpress in the style of a oyster glide-lock; although the photo showed it was unbranded the one that was delivered was made by Rolex. Guess I got lucky?
When they remove the back yes they will see their movement.
But if after market bits have been added on or the watch is frankenised it will take time even for the Rolex service centre to find out. You will have to go to the back of the queue for that type of service. By the time u get an answer the seller would have long gone.
I think i will never buy Rolex from ebay...ever. Even if the seller is a so called dealer of high end watches. The game is crooked.
Whilst on the topic...
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/MENS-ROLE...UAAOSwfdFai03r
The concept of Market Ouvert was abolished in 1995
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_ouvert