Your quoted reply was in relation to the Guinand, not the Seiko Presages.
Aside from good photos on Hodinkee for the Grand Seikos, this has to be the most impressive report so far… http://www.watchprosite.com/page-wf....open_bLoB_s-0/
So the SLA025 is 45mm?
Deal breaker for us small wristed folk. Shame that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by waser; 22nd March 2018 at 13:20.
Your quoted reply was in relation to the Guinand, not the Seiko Presages.
Aside from good photos on Hodinkee for the Grand Seikos, this has to be the most impressive report so far… http://www.watchprosite.com/page-wf....open_bLoB_s-0/
Mixed feelings about the Tudor gmt. I see value but doesn’t tug at the heart strings. I think they could have done better than just combining regular black bay with rolexy gmt. Can’t they have made it a bit more distinctive?? In summary feels lazy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I love seiko but am getting really sick of these 44mm releases.
Sent from my [device_name] using TZ-UK mobile app
Waiting to see how thick these Seamasters are with the new movement and the glass caseback. One thing I love about my old 2255 is the case dimensions, the SMPc was already moving in the wrong direction and worry these will be even thicker. I do like the look of them though from the pictures I’ve seen, especially the grey dial - though I thought that about last years AT and didn’t like them when I actually handled them.
Like the BB GMT though I think a very pale silver dial would make an interesting variation... And have me queuing for one.
The LE SJE073J1 looks like the SARX055 JDM watch, which I really like, but it was already overpriced because of the Ti. Now it's SS (slimmer though) and will cost almost double (2200 EUR)... Why?
https://www.seikowatches.com/global-...esage/SJE073J1
A strange situation at Seiko where the Presage solves the thickness issue with a new caliber that makes it under 10mm, while the GS autos remain in 13mm territory. The cheaper watch will most likely wear better than some top of the range GS.
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/se...in-introducing
Meanwhile that Zenith Defy wrist shot is a bit of a downer, it looks so much cruder than in the official photos. Hoping it’s just a bad shot, but feeling less optimistic on this one now.
I do wonder if the tactic from Tudor is to be the gateway drug for Rolex.
Image1521725949.905482.jpg
Image1521725956.958303.jpg
EDIT: why are the photos so blurry? They’re phone screenshots so originally fine, and I’ve never had a problem uploading photos before.
A few more images of the very tasty SLA025/SBEX007.
and one of the movement:
It may be 'only a Seiko' but in the context of pricing of steel sports Rolexes, looks something of a bargain at 550,000 Yen.
Martin
p.s. Still too big though.
Last edited by MartinCRC; 22nd March 2018 at 15:06.
Seiko’s pricing in the export markets has been ambitious for the past 2 years now, since the introduction of the ceramic GS models.
The price of this is not much different to the white enamel dials of the Presage 60th Anniversary models released last year, and the new calibre needs to recoup investment spend on its R&D.
Being a limited edition and a model differentiator, the price also reflects that aspect.
I’d be highly surprised if the typical purchase price was any more than 2K, if as much, even allowing for its LE status.
Sorry, my grammar was ambiguous, that's not at all the point I was trying to make - I was trying to say that to criticise Zenith for looking like Kickstarter watches that rip off Zenith designs is like criticising Tudors for looking like cheap homage watches that rip off Rolex.
^^^ Ummm... no.
^^^ HELL YES!!!!
^^^ Interesting how the dial looks aged with spot marks.
Last edited by OliverCD; 22nd March 2018 at 15:50.
Tick yer boxes: gold case, gold bracelet, chronograph, perpetual calendar, interchangeable backs:
£147,570
Amazing that we’ve now gone from reproducing the pleasantly creamy / tea colour of aged lume, to reproducing what is essentially mould on a dial. I guess a plain modern one just looked too clean, and yet...
I love the beautifully aged quality of some vintage watches, but trying to copy that in a new piece feels inauthentic and I could never take the watch quite as seriously. I suppose they will be able to do it increasingly convincingly in future if this trend continues, but the result will always be a reproduction in the end, not even a re-issue.
Has anyone found "in the metal" photos of the new 114300 Oyster Perpetual 39 dials? They're being very coy.
I'd go for it if was minimum 39mm. I appreciate the originals were tiny tiny 34/35mm, but tastes have changed, and I wouldnt want have to hold the thing up to my face and peer at a tiny watch to see the time..
Thanks - that second one is definitely a 36 but you're right there's something not right about the first one. I do hope the website photos (renders?) are correct and they are all equal - it's an improvement over the existing design I think.
Perhaps photos will begin to trickle out now the GMT hype is settling down.
A sniper would spot this without his scope!! Looks nicely finished - applied numbers in lume!