I didn’t know there was a ‘proper’ Pogue…but following on from comments above this explains it: https://www.plus9time.com/blog/2017/...raph-6139-6005
I didn’t know there was a ‘proper’ Pogue…but following on from comments above this explains it: https://www.plus9time.com/blog/2017/...raph-6139-6005
https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h...-guide.140803/
The watch in the photo doesn't look "right".
Although no trees were harmed during the creation of this post, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.
In the OP? It's not the sharpest of pictures but the watch looks all original to me.Originally Posted by Backward point
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote