Can’t you just remove the back seats, and get the V5 re classified as LGV/commercial?
Would require inspection obviously
I had a 90 from 1992 and it was LGV on the V5
Did it have side windows? i.e. was it a Station Wagon?
All post 2009 Defenders were classified as LGV. That’s the problem. It’s what it says on the V5 that determines whether you get charged or not. My Defender is classed as an LGV so I can’t drive in the CAZ without paying. Pre-2009 Defenders which aren’t Euro5 compliant, are classed as cars & so are exempt. My fine advises me that I’ve been charged because my vehicle does not meet the CAZ emissions standard. So how do pre-2009, & non Euro5 compliant Defenders meet it?
There were quite a few changes in 2009 to comply with EU regulations to do with licenses so I wonder if the change to LGV was in part due to something in there.
Might be as simple as we can’t comply with X so we’ll reclassify it as Y rather than spend on making it compliant.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
I'm many years out of date with LRs now, but in the dim'n'distant days of yesteryonk, only those that left the factory as 'County Station Wagon' models could be classed as cars, while those with a total (IIRC...) of 9 seats would be classed as minibuses, while all the rest were vans. This classification could - perhaps - still haunt the many ground-up rebuilds out there if they're still on their original VIN?
Maybe car excise duty? But HRMC do not countenance it as an LGV as it does not meet their definition of one.
I thought that it had something to do with it no longer meeting the regulations for new cars, but those regulations didn’t apply to vans eg. it doesn’t have air bags.