^^^ And gets in early…
Saying she basically hadn’t seen various documents, that made it clear there were problems.
Isn't it funny, if you are a director of a limited company and it is decided that you have misbehaved you become personally responsible, yet if you're the boss of a massive corporate entity!
Personally I don't think she should be allowed to apologise, she can't wipe this clean
She's apologised already and is maintaining her hands were clean, if anything she was ''too trusting'' of colleagues and counsel, there was no conspiracy, it was institutional and governance failures. lolz...she needs a thwack round her lying ginger head, focus her mind.
Cor she earned 5.1 million in her time at the PO, that's roughly ten times the average Brits life time earnings, , yet maintained such incredible ignorance of sooo much...christ, really it's a different world, nice work if you can get it.
Last edited by Passenger; Yesterday at 10:35.
There is simply no way that she was not aware there was a significant question mark over the reliability of the Horizon system, and therefore prosecutions and convictions.
And therefore she should, and could have brought a screeching halt to any and all ongoing prosecutions, and instigated a public review. As CEO she had the power to do that, but she chose not to.
So clever my foot fell off.