I thought this dramatisation would kick off a response, it gets worse. I recently discovered that someone in the P.O. security team raised this with P.O management with two options.
1. Own upwhich would cause damage to P.O. brand and cost millions in compensation or
2. Keep on prosecution postmasters and try to hide it.

Guess which option the P.O went for?

I am interested to see reaction in papers later this week as it hits the public what an appalling episode of corporate malfeasance this is.

Criminal proceedings to follow, I hope.